A defense move, aimed at derailing preliminary hearing for a Lone Grove man charged with the 2007 murder of his mother, delayed proceedings Wednesday, but the case remains on the judicial track and headed for trial.
Mary Bruehl, indigent defense co-counsel for Lee Purser, challenged autopsy and DNA reports linking Purser to his mother, Pam Purser’s, death. The effort to halt the preliminary hearing came when District Attorney Craig Ladd attempted to enter the reports into evidence as he rested the state’s case.
Bruehl, cited a recent Supreme Court decision concerning lab results in a cocaine case, as relevant to her client. She claimed Purser was being denied his rights to “confront witnesses” if the court accepted the reports as evidence rather than demanding those who wrote the reports to testify in person.
The defense attorney also argued a yet-unpublished Oklahoma court decision regarding evidence in child molestation cases also supported her claim.
Ladd rebutted Bruehl’s argument saying the Supreme Court opinion concerned only evidence presented during trial, not pre-trial hearings. The district attorney also questioned the validity of Bruehl’s argument since the decision was directed at lab results in a narcotics case.
“I’d be willing to bet it (decision) doesn’t apply to DNA analysis,” Ladd said.
Special District Judge Charles Tate recessed proceedings taking an hour to research the defense challenge. The judge returned to the courtroom ruling in Ladd’s favor concerning the Supreme Court decision.
However, Tate also discussed the unpublished Oklahoma decision and invited Bruehl and co-counsel Vicki Floyd to file a “written” motion seeking a separate hearing on the issue If they wanted to continue the challenge. The pair of attorneys conducted a brief whispered conference. Bruehl then announced she “stood” on her argument to the court, but would make no other attempts to stay the preliminary hearing.
Ladd entered all three reports into evidence, telling the judge the autopsy report indicated Purser’s mother died as a result of a knife attack. The district attorney told Tate one DNA report identified blood found on Purser’s tennis shoes as his mother’s. He said the report rebutted the defendant’s claim he had not been in his mother’s house before his brother, Gene, discovered her body and law enforcement was on the scene.
Ladd said the second DNA report also substantiated the state’s allegations that Purser was the person who was involved in what was a deadly struggle with his mother on June 17, 2007.
Earlier in the proceedings, Purser’s brother testified. Gene Purser told Tate he and his sibling had both been at their father’s lake house during the weekend preceding his mother’s murder.